Concrete composition delays Finland's Olkiluoto 3

9 May 2006

Unexpectedly high water content in concrete castings for Finland's Olkiluoto 3 European Pressurized Water Reactor (EPR), together with some faulty forgings are expected to delay the project by some nine months.

The 1600MWe project located some 250km northwest of Helsinki had been due to begin operations in mid-2009, but the issues related to some components and site preparation are now expected to push this back until late 2009 or early 2010.

Project director Martin Landtman, said slightly too high water contents were measured in some concrete lots and, therefore, the operation of the concrete plant was stopped in early February. There was no question that the delivered concrete would not fulfil the set strength requirements and this has been verified from cast test pieces, said Landtman, and concreting operations have now resumed.

Olkiluoto 3 is owned by Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO), a non-profit power group formed by the city of Helsinki and a number of large consumers, but the cost of the delays will have to be borne by its contractors. Areva and Siemens signed a fixed-price contract for the construction of the first nuclear reactor to be built in the European Union since the early 1990s.

The latest announcement adds to the late January announcement of delays amounting to more than six months over issues related to detailed engineering and the need to correct deviations in the manufacture of components.

Areva in its first quarter 2006 results stated: “The six-month delay announced at the end of December 2005 has been re-estimated at 8-9 months due to the two months failing of a Finnish company in charge of concrete works. The group will assess the potential consequences of this delay’s evolution in its 2006 financial statements.”

Advocates of the project suggest that while the delays are disappointing, they highlight the high standards of quality control and safety.

Related Articles
ECJ rules on uranium export

The Brazilians would not be covered by EU rules designed to ensure an adequate supply of uranium in the EU, just because they had business relations with an EU company

Privacy Policy
We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.