Security federalisation unnecessary

1 February 2002

Plans to federalise nuclear facility security forces would bring no advantages, according to the Nuclear Energy Institute.

In a statement, the institute concluded: "Because of the high calibre of existing security forces and because a power plant's management should be unified across operational and security functions, legislative proposals to federalise nuclear security forces offer no advantages. In contrast, federalisation of security officers could complicate responses to acts of terrorism or sabotage." Meanwhile, Senator Bob Graham (D-FL) and Congressman Mark Foley (R-FL) made separate statements to express their opposition to the proposed legislation.

During a visit to the St Lucie plant, Graham, who heads the Senate Intelligence Committee, called on his colleagues in Congress "not to overreact", adding: "Don't adopt a one-size-fits-all mentality for nuclear power plants." Foley, who represents the congressional district in which St Lucie is located stated: "Turning a private worker into a federal bureaucrat has nothing to do with protecting us from terrorism."

Privacy Policy
We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.